project focused on sustainable land use planning.
Find out more about us >>
Asphalt plant fact sheet misleading
Letter to the Editor
The Valley Springs News, Friday August 7, 2015
Editor:
The asphalt plant proponentsâ July 28 âFact Sheetâ is not all facts. Some âfactsâ are incorrect, some are opinion, others are supposition (without proof), speculation (theoretical), or conjecture (guessing).
The Hot Mix Asphalt Plant is not a âBatchâ plant. CB Asphaltâs description is, âDrum Mix Asphalt Concrete Hot Plantâ which is âgradually replacing batch mix plantsâ (pg. 23 of the Air Pollution Control District July 23 Engineering Evaluation).
Job claims of âup to 25 new jobs on site and 300 trucking jobsâ are supposition, just as the supervisorâs email âpotential to employ 10 plus full time employees from this countyâ was speculation.
Talk about an âenclosed systemâ to control fumes confuses and misleads people. The asphalt truck loading area is not enclosed; and asphalt trucks are not enclosed or covered. Residents will be able to smell odors and emissions from trucks.
âTruck traffic will flow…not by any residential areasâ is blatantly untrue, as local residents can attest.
Claims of âless than 3 additional trucks per operating dayâ are doubtful. No information has been provided on existing aggregate production volume or existing truck traffic, so there is no basis for âmaximum additional.â The quarry will continue to sell rock to whoever needs it, in addition to using rock for asphalt. Using data supplied by the applicants, there is an annual potential for 10,000 trucks to haul asphalt, 600+ trucks to import liquid asphalt cement, and 2,300 trucks needed to import RAP (recycled asphalt pavement, planned by CB Asphalt to be 25% of the hot mix asphalt as per page 23 of EE). And there will be additional trucks to deliver asphalt burner fuel.
âWill have no impacts on property valuesâ is conjecture, not fact.
âThe Authority to Construct permit…is not discretionary and not applicable to the California Environmental Quality Actâ is proponentsâ opinion only. Calaveras County, County Counsel, and the Planning Department disagree, and the Planning Commission denied the proponents appeal.
The newlyâreleased engineerâs report does not âallay any concerns on the air pollution issue.â The July 23 Engineering Evaluation does not acknowledge or measure emissions and fumes from asphalt trucks. Potentially, thousands of asphalt trucks will be driving through residential neighborhoods, local highways, and through the 12/26 intersection in downtown Valley Springs.
Donât be misled by a âFact Sheet.â Residents need real information. They need a comprehensive review of existing conditions on the ground and potential impacts. They need an Environmental Impact Report on the proposed asphalt plant.
Joyce Techel
President
MyValleySprings.com